What does "supported decision-making" entail?

What does "supported decision-making" entail?

• A. A method where individuals are forced to allow others to decide for them
• B. A practice of assisting individuals in making their own decisions rather than stripping them of decision-making capacity
• C. A legal strategy for obtaining control over a person's finances
• D. A temporary arrangement where someone else makes decisions

Answer: (B)

"Supported decision-making" entails a practice where individuals are assisted in making their own decisions while retaining their autonomy and decision-making capacity. This approach acknowledges that people can have support from trusted individuals, such as family members, friends, or professionals, who help them gather information, weigh options, and consider potential outcomes, but ultimately the individual retains the right to make their own choices. This method is significant as it emphasizes empowerment and respect for individual rights. It recognizes that individuals are capable of making decisions about their lives, even if they face challenges or disabilities. Supported decision-making is aligned with person-centered values that prioritize the voice and preferences of the individual. The other options do not accurately capture the essence of supported decision-making. The first option implies coercion and lack of agency, which is contrary to the supportive nature of this practice. The third option focuses on control over finances and does not encompass the broader aspect of personal decision-making in other life areas. The last option suggests a temporary removal of decision-making from the individual, which opposes the fundamental principle of supporting individuals in their own decision-making processes.

"Supported decision-making" entails a practice where individuals are assisted in making their own decisions while retaining their autonomy and decision-making capacity. This approach acknowledges that people can have support from trusted individuals, such as family members, friends, or professionals, who help them gather information, weigh options, and consider potential outcomes, but ultimately the individual retains the right to make their own choices.

This method is significant as it emphasizes empowerment and respect for individual rights. It recognizes that individuals are capable of making decisions about their lives, even if they face challenges or disabilities. Supported decision-making is aligned with person-centered values that prioritize the voice and preferences of the individual.

The other options do not accurately capture the essence of supported decision-making. The first option implies coercion and lack of agency, which is contrary to the supportive nature of this practice. The third option focuses on control over finances and does not encompass the broader aspect of personal decision-making in other life areas. The last option suggests a temporary removal of decision-making from the individual, which opposes the fundamental principle of supporting individuals in their own decision-making processes.